Five Consulting Skills That Rarely Show Up When It Matters
And why most of us overestimate them
Most consultants would describe themselves as analytical, communicative, adaptable, client-oriented, and good listeners. And to be fair, many are.
The problem is not that these skills are missing. It’s that they are often assumed rather than practiced. Below are five skills that are widely claimed—and much harder to demonstrate consistently in real client work.
1. Listening Without Immediately Solving
For many consultants, the first challenge is simply staying quiet while the client is talking. Not interrupting, not finishing sentences, not jumping in with a solution halfway through the problem description.
A more advanced step comes after that. It is listening without mentally solving the problem at the same time. Without filtering what you hear through a ready-made model, framework, or slide deck. Without silently deciding what the “real” problem is before the client has even finished describing their version of it.
Real listening means allowing vague, messy, or even partially wrong problem descriptions to exist for a while. It means resisting the urge to reframe too early—especially when the reframe happens to match something you already know well.
How to develop it:
In your next client conversation, wait until the other person has clearly finished and then summarize what you heard before offering any solution. If your summary feels almost boringly literal, and you feel slightly impatient while doing it, you are probably listening properly.
It also helps to remind yourself that even a consultant is allowed to say, “Let me think about this and get back to you.” Having an immediate answer is optional. Understanding the question is not.
2. Explaining Without Showing How Smart You Are
Most consultants can explain complex things. For many, the basic challenge is simply not overexplaining. Not adding one more caveat, reference, or edge case “just in case.”
But only few can explain things in a way that does not subtly center yourself (or your company) in the explanation.
Clear explanations require restraint. Choosing simpler words when more complex ones would be available. Leaving out details that are technically impressive but practically irrelevant. Getting rid of the jargon. Allowing the client to arrive at the conclusion slightly on their own, instead of being walked there step by step. If what remains feels thin or awkward, the explanation may have been doing more signaling than clarifying.
This often feels uncomfortable at first. It can feel like underselling your expertise. In reality, it usually does the opposite.
How to develop it:
After explaining something, ask yourself whether it would still make sense without jargon, technical details, or marketing pitches. Then ask whether it would still hold if someone else repeated it five minutes later. If it only works when you are the one delivering it, it probably needs simplifying.
3. Saying “It Doesn’t Matter” (And Meaning It)
Consulting attracts people who like to optimize. The problem is that when everything looks important, nothing really is.
Strong consultants can say, with credibility, that some issues are not worth solving right now. Or at all. This takes judgment rather than analysis. It also means being comfortable leaving potential value on the table, which goes against the instinct to demonstrate usefulness in every discussion.
Often the difficult part is not deciding what matters, but being willing to say out loud what does not.
How to develop it:
In meetings, practice explicitly naming one thing you are not going to focus on and explain why. If it feels slightly uncomfortable to say, it is probably the right kind of prioritization.
4. Staying Neutral Under Pressure
Everyone claims to be objective. Some even manage to stay neutral while the situation is still calm.
The real test comes when neutrality has a cost. When stakeholders disagree, politics surface, money is on the line, or there is quiet pressure to “just support this direction so we can move on.”
True neutrality is not fence-sitting. It is the ability to describe trade-offs honestly even when the room would clearly prefer a simpler story. That often means slowing things down when others want speed, or adding nuance when consensus feels close.
How to develop it:
When presenting options, make it a habit to articulate at least one downside of the preferred option—especially if everyone else seems aligned. Do it calmly, without drama. The goal is not to block decisions, but to keep them honest.
5. Knowing When to Step Back
Many consultants are good at stepping in. The harder part is noticing when continued involvement starts to dilute ownership. When you are still in the room, still answering questions, still smoothing things over—but no longer enabling real learning or independent decision-making.
At that point, staying involved can actually slow things down. Not because the consultant is doing poor work, but because the client never quite has to carry the full weight of the decisions themselves. Things move forward, but they do not always stick.
Stepping back at the right moment requires confidence that your value is not measured only in visibility, slides, or hours billed. Sometimes the most useful thing you can do is to let the client continue without you and see whether the thinking holds on its own.
How to develop it:
At the end of a project phase, ask explicitly whether your role is still needed in the same way. It feels risky. In practice, consultants who do this often help ownership take root—and are trusted enough to be invited back later.
What Actually Makes the Difference
None of these skills are rare in theory. Most consultants recognize them immediately and would say they practice them regularly.
What makes them difficult is not complexity, but context. Time pressure, expectations, client dynamics, and the quiet incentives of consulting work all push behavior in the opposite direction. Toward faster answers, clearer positions, visible activity, and continuous involvement.
That is why these skills tend to fade exactly when they matter most.
Good consulting is less about having the right traits and more about applying restraint at the right moments. Listening a bit longer. Explaining a bit less. Letting some things go. Staying neutral when it would be easier not to. Stepping back before being asked.
These are small choices, but they compound over time. They often separate consultants who are merely competent from those clients genuinely trust. Not because they know more, but because they are more deliberate in how they use what they know.
📚 Related Reads from the IT Consulting Career Hub
If this topic resonated with you, you might also enjoy:
👨💻About the Author
Eetu Niemi is an enterprise architect, consultant, and author.
Follow him elsewhere: Homepage | LinkedIn | Substack (enterprise architecture ) | Medium (writing) | Homepage (FI)
Books: Enterprise Architecture | Technology Consultant Fast Track | Successful Technology Consulting | Kokonaisarkkitehtuuri (FI) | Pohjoisen tie (FI) | Little Cthulhu’s Breakfast Time
Web resources: Enterprise Architecture Info Package (FI)





