When the Client Challenges Your Time Entries in Consulting
What every consultant should do when someone doubts your Wednesday afternoon
Time entries are part of everyday consulting life. We don’t usually talk about them, celebrate them, or enjoy writing them—but they keep the whole business running. Most of the time, the client accepts them without much thought.
And then there are the other times. Probably every consultant eventually gets the message that starts with something like this:
“Could you explain these hours?”
And suddenly your mind jumps back four weeks wondering what on earth you did on that Wednesday afternoon, and why you wrote only “Preparation 3 h.”
The good news: you can handle this.
The honest news: if the client starts challenging your time entries, the situation might already be partly lost. Not necessarily because of the hours themselves, but because trust has taken a small hit. Or the situation might be a symptom of something larger. This doesn’t mean the assignment is doomed, but it is a signal worth taking seriously.
Let’s walk through what to do, and how to avoid ending up there next time.
Why Clients Challenge Time Entries
Clients rarely question hours just for fun. When it happens, there’s almost always something underneath. Sometimes the work took more time than they expected, or the outcome didn’t match the picture they had in their mind. Sometimes they simply didn’t see the value you produced, or they can’t understand what actually required the hours.
Occasionally, the challenge has very little to do with you: the client might be under pressure to reduce costs, justify spending to someone above them, or deal with internal politics that make every line in the invoice look like a potential problem.
In many cases, the project or the entire cooperation already has a bit of tension, and your time entries become the easiest place to express that frustration. It’s not personal—it’s just the part of the process that’s easiest to question.
This is why it’s important to remember: the hours themselves are rarely the real issue. They’re simply the most visible symptom. When trust is strong, nobody counts minutes. But when trust is shaky, even a 30-minute task can turn into a conversation you didn’t expect.
How to Avoid These Situations in the First Place
The easiest time-entry discussion is the one that never happens. And often you can prevent it long before anyone looks at the hours. The trick is to get the basics right at the start of the assignment, and stick to them.
Make sure the scope is clear and mutually understood. Not just in the statement of work but in real-world, day-to-day terms: what you’re actually expected to do, when, and to what depth. If the client expects “light support” and you deliver “deep analysis,” you may still be right—but they won’t be happy when the hours appear.
Agree on weekly workload or a maximum number of hours if needed. Some clients want steady flow, some want intensity, some want flexibility. If expectations aren’t aligned, the time entries become the first place where the mismatch shows up.
Also decide in advance how you handle extra work, surprises, or new tasks that come out of nowhere. Most clients are perfectly reasonable when you say, “This wasn’t in the original scope, shall we approve a few extra hours?” They become less reasonable when they see those hours on the invoice without any warning.
And of course: do the work the client actually wants and needs. This sounds obvious, but it’s easy to drift into polishing something they don’t value, or investigating something they didn’t ask for. When your work aligns tightly with their goals, the hours make sense. When it doesn’t, every hour becomes a small negotiation.
In short: clarity, alignment, and communication prevent more time-entry trouble than any perfect description ever could.
Make Sure Your Time Entries Can Survive Daylight
In addition to good scoping and clear expectations, there’s another very practical way to prevent time-entry problems: make sure your time entries themselves are solid. Surprisingly often, the issue isn’t the work you did, but how it looks on the invoice.
There are two basics here: write your hours on time, and write them well. Both matter. If you wait until Friday, you won’t remember what you actually did—only what you intended to do. And intentions don’t make for convincing explanations later. So write your hours while the details are still fresh.
Good time entries are clear, concrete, and written from the client’s point of view, not your own. They explain what happened and what moved forward, instead of hiding behind vague labels. There’s a world of difference between “Prepared workshop: refined agenda, created draft slides, aligned findings with project scope, sent materials for review” and the classic “Prep 3 h.”
The first one tells a story the client can follow. The second one invites questions, or imagination. And the client’s imagination, especially when budgets are tight, rarely paints the most flattering picture.
Also: if the client has special reporting rules (“By the way, we use cost categories / project codes / sprint references / Jira tasks”), adopt them immediately.
Finally, this sounds almost too obvious to mention, but it’s worth saying out loud: your hours must match the work you actually did. Not what the task “usually” takes, not what you think the client is willing to pay, and definitely not what would look nice on a report. Your time entries should reflect the truth, even if the truth isn’t pretty. No inventing, no polishing.
What to Do When the Client Challenges Your Hours
Even with good scope, clear expectations, and solid time entries, there may still come a day when the client challenges your hours. It happens to every consultant sooner or later. When it does, the most important thing is not to panic, and not to make the situation worse by reacting too fast.
Here are three steps that help you keep the situation controlled and professional.
1. Stay Calm and Stay Factual
Your first instinct might be to defend yourself immediately or explain everything at once. Don’t. You don’t yet know what’s behind the question—curiosity, confusion, budget pressure, an internal audit, or something else entirely.
A better opening is something simple and neutral: “Thanks for raising this. Let’s go through these together.”
After that, walk them through the basics in a calm, structured way: what you did, why it took the time, and what the outcome or deliverable was. Sometimes this requires a small round of “consulting archaeology”: digging through your calendar, emails, Teams messages, Jira tasks, and old notes to reconstruct what actually happened on a specific Tuesday afternoon. It’s not glamorous, but it helps you provide clear, concrete explanations.
Most clients want clarity, not conflict. A straightforward walkthrough usually resolves the issue in minutes.
And if you’re unsure how to respond—or the conversation starts to feel difficult —escalate to your manager or ask for advice. You don’t have to handle the situation alone, especially if it hints at a deeper issue in the project.
2. Know When to Stand Your Ground—and When to Let It Go
Not every hour is worth fighting for. Sometimes it’s easier to credit a small amount and move on. It’s not a judgment about your work—it’s a political decision that keeps the project moving. And importantly, this is not a decision you make alone. Agree with your manager or project lead how you handle the situation before communicating anything to the client.
But other times, the hours are correct, the work definitely happened, and the client is simply feeling budget pressure. In those cases, after aligning with your manager, it’s perfectly reasonable to say calmly: “I understand the concern. From my side, these hours reflect the actual work. I’m happy to walk through the details again.”
3. Reflect Honestly After the Dust Settles
Once things are resolved, take a moment to reflect—without self-blame, but with honesty. Ask yourself:
Were my time entries clear enough for someone outside the work?
Did I stay within the agreed scope and workload?
Did the client understand what I was actually working on?
Was I visible, or did I do too much “behind-the-scenes” work?
Were expectations aligned from the beginning?
Could something else in the assignment have triggered this reaction?
Very often, the underlying cause isn’t the hours. It’s communication. And improving communication tends to prevent these situations from happening again.
And Yes—Sometimes the Real Issue Isn’t the Hours at All
When a client starts inspecting your hours with a microscope, the root cause is often somewhere else entirely. It may be a sign they’re unhappy with the project, unsure about your role, or feeling budget pressure. Sometimes they didn’t fully understand your deliverables.
It can also be that a bit of trust has quietly eroded—either trust in you as a consultant or in your consultancy as a whole. And occasionally the whole situation begins simply because someone higher up suddenly asked the classic question: “Why are we paying for this?”
In other words, time-entry problems are usually not about the time entries themselves. They’re early warning signals. And if those signals repeat, don’t try to handle them alone—bring your project manager into the discussion, or raise the issue openly with the client before it becomes a bigger problem.
Final Thoughts
Time entries may look like a small administrative detail, but when they go wrong, they can create surprisingly big problems. Clear, timely, and client-friendly entries prevent most issues. And so does early alignment on scope, workload, and expectations. A bit of proactive communication goes a long way.
And if a client still challenges your hours, it doesn’t automatically mean you did anything wrong. It usually means something in the assignment needs attention, whether it’s understanding, expectations, or trust. The smart move is to address it early, calmly, and with facts rather than emotion.
👉 Has a client ever challenged your time entries? How did you handle it?
See you next time,
Eetu Niemi
IT Consulting Career Hub 🚀
✍️ Follow My Writing-About-Writing on Medium
If you’re curious in the writing side of my work, I published a new article on Medium about how I’ve built my writing career while working a four-day week. It’s my second piece there, and it was featured in The Writing Cooperative, a publication with 288,000 followers. The article is behind a paywall.
I’ll keep writing on Medium as well, focusing more on the writing process and career side of things.
📚 Related Reads from the IT Consulting Career Hub
If this topic resonated with you, you might also enjoy:
👨💻About the Author
Eetu Niemi is an enterprise architect, consultant, and author.
Follow him elsewhere:
Homepage | LinkedIn | Substack (enterprise architecture ) | Medium (writing)
Books: Enterprise Architecture | Mastering IT Consulting





